![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome Guest: |
| You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed ...all memberships from the old mastercatters website will not transfer...you must register on this site and respond to your email for your registration to complete. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Please try to make the meeting May 3, 2011 or write the committee to express your views on the subject.
Here's a email from Bob Greenlee (DGIF) James and Jeffrey, Please help get the word out to ODCC members and others you feel may have an interest in the following meeting: The Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries is planning to host a meeting 6:00 PM Tuesday May 3rd for anglers interested in tidal river blue catfish. The meeting will be held at the VDGIF Charles City County office (3801 John Tyler Memorial Hwy). The goal of the meeting will be to provide information regarding management and policy actions targeting blue catfish which are being considered by the Chesapeake Bay Program Sustainable Goal Implementation Team (GIT). A stated goal of the GIT is to develop (by the end of 2011) a Chesapeake Bay wide policy for blue catfish management - which would likely have ramifications for tidal river recreational blue catfish fisheries in Virginia - particularly the trophy fishery. During the May 3rd meeting a presentation will be given which will provide anglers with information related to this topic. For background information, the following is a excerpt from minutes of the GIT's December 2010 meeting: Fisheries GIT Executive Committee agreed that blue catfish constitute an invasive species that demands further management consideration. o Fisheries GIT brainstormed several management alternatives (e.g. eradication) but did not reach a consensus on any specific near term management actions. o Based on science advice from presenters, eradication of this species was deemed not viable • Fisheries GIT established and tasked a blue catfish workgroup to develop a “best effort” stock assessment (population estimate) to determine best alternative policy options to be considered at the next full GIT meeting. This is a step forward in coordinating the development of an agreement/policy between the Bay states on blue catfish. See the following web links for additional background information. http://archive.chesapeakebay.net/pub...es_1_11059.pdf http://www.chesapeakebay.net/team_fi...menuitem=51029 Please contact me if you'd like to discuss, or would like additional information. And, I appreciate your assistance in getting the word out regarding the May 3rd 6:00 PM meeting at VDGIF Charles City County office. Last edited by WVBowhunter; 05-13-2011 at 10:46. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
ttt
__________________
"Aye and lightning bolts fly from my arse" William Wallace
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I talked with Bob today....this is very serious and he suggested that ALL anglers get involved to speak their mind on this issue because GIT is setting their sites on making a decision by Sept. 2011. That decision could be to give control of the Blues back to VMRC and open up the limits to ANY SIZE catfish. This would wipe out our trophy river within a year or two if this happens.
Currently trophy Blues are less than 2% of the Blue population in the James River...opening up that small percentage to the commercial guys would end what we have currently. This would not only affect anglers but local businesses also, guides, motels, gas stations, stores, bait shops, etc... the list goes on. If ever there's a time that we need each and everyone of your support it's right now...we need to attempt to stop them (GIT) from changing the regulations on Blues. Spread the word please. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
This evening is the meeting for those who wish to learn what we can do to protect our trophy fishery. Please try to attend.
It's at the Charles City DGIF office on Rt. 5 at 6:00 pm |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just got back from a very poor showing at the meeting!! If that's a sign as to how important protecting our trophy fishery is, you can pretty much sign off the catfish boards because from what I heard tonight at the meeting, it's going to take ALL of us as individuals to sit down and write/email every member of G.I.T. and explain how much revenue is provided to the local economy from blue catfishing and how it needs to stay where it's at.
Here's one option put up to the G.I.T. to attempt to rid the catfish from ALL waterways connected to the bay. Set the rules that if you catch a catfish it CAN'T be released, YOU MUST KEEP IT, regardless of the size. Think about it, how long will it take before WE would wipe out the trophy cats ourselves? We've got to stop them and the only way is each and every one of us who fish the rivers connected to the bay, to sit down and write a letter to each member of the committee expressing our concern for local economy if they take the trophy Blue Catfish fishery away by changing the current DGIF regs.. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I was going to post up the Power Point of the meeting last night but it seems that the extension ppt is not allowed on MC.
Any ideas??? |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'll post everything on my website tonight when I get home.
riverlizard.com this will include contact information for anyone who is interested in writing a letter to members of GIT. Bob reminded us to focus on economics and really nothing else (no finger pointing to the comms) Just explain how the Blue catfish supplies revenue to local areas and how this revenue will be lost if the regs don't stay the way they are. It's a trophy fishery as it stands, opening up the limits will wipe out the trophy part of it and the revenue for local businesses will decrease. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
You said no finger pointing, buts thats what they are doing. They are pointing at the cats saying they are eating everything without any proof.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's what Bob Greenlee asked us not to do when writing a letter to GIT members. It was hard for me to not include something related to them in my letters. Let's see, the Atlantic Sturgeon was almost wiped out...by who? The Comm guys by over-harvesting them. If they're not watched closely, they'd wipe out just about any species that could make them money!
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here is Bobs response to me
RE: blue cat as invasive Sent By: "Bob Greenlee (DGIF)" To: fishnvince@comcast.net Cc: "Peyton Robertson" Tidal BCF Status Report_2011.doc (283.3 KB) Download | Remove Invaisive Catfi...up Tasks_v2.doc (36.8 KB) Download | Remove Vincent, I appreciate your concern for, and interest in, recreational tidal river blue catfish fisheries. The points you make regarding the importance of these fisheries are valid. A lot of information is being placed on message boards and spreading in other media regarding this issue. Therefore, I want to take this opportunity to provide you with a report generated by VDGIF which summarizes the status of recreational tidal blue catfish fisheries and provides summary information related to the issues circulating on the web -- See attached "Tidal Blue Catfish Status Report". One of the topics of interest circulating among anglers has been recent activities of the Chesapeake Bay Sustainable Fisheries Implementation Team (GIT), as these activities relate to recreational blue catfish fisheries. In December of 2010, after hearing from a panel of scientists regarding blue catfish in tidal rivers, the GIT formed a Workgroup of scientists tasked with examining the science (What is known? What key information is lacking?) and status of blue catfish. Flathead catfish were later added to the Workgroup's task list. The Workgroup was asked to provide the GIT with a full range of management options prior to the GIT's upcoming June 2011 meeting. To give you a better indication of this ongoing process, the most recent tasking document from the GIT to the catfish Workgroup is attached. In the time since the GIT December 2010 meeting, a draft resolution on blue catfish and flathead catfish has been developed for the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC). An early draft of the ASMFC resolution defines blue catfish and flathead catfish as “invasive”, and states “that all practicable efforts should be made to reduce the population level and range of non-native invasive species” in the Chesapeake Bay watershed – which would, as defined by the draft resolution, include Virginia’s tidal river blue catfish populations. Obviously, this resolution has also been a source of interest to catfish anglers such as yourself As stated on the GIT's web site (http://www.chesapeakebay.net/team_fi...menuitem=51029) and on the ASMFC website (http://www.asmfc.org/), public and stakeholder involvement is welcomed in these ongoing processes. As these processes move forward, I am sure the GIT and ASMFC will be identifying for stakeholders such as yourself, the most appropriate mechanisms for your involvement. Thanks again for your interest in tidal river blue catfish fisheries. Feel free to contact me if you'd like to discuss these topics further, or would like additional information related to Virginia's tidal river recreational fisheries. Bob Greenlee - District Fisheries Biologist Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries 3801 John Tyler Memorial Highway Charles City, VA 23030 Phone: 804 829-6715 Fax: 804 829-6788 email: bob.greenlee@dgif.virginia.gov
__________________
US NAVY -1981-1987 SUPPORT OUR TROOPS |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"The solution to any problem -- work, love, money, whatever -- is to go fishing, and the worse the problem, the longer the trip should be." --John Gierach ![]() |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
I got from it that "scientist" were assigned to do a study and it is complete and they are recomeneding them as invasive and he not gona argue it. Dosent seem to concerened with it.
__________________
"you cant believe everything you read on the internet" -Ben Franklin gone fishing please leave a message
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
That's what I was saying. "Our scientists 'are doing/have done/are going to do' a study.." Is too vague of an answer to be acceptable. Nine times out of ten when a study on the effects of invasive species on a particular biome is done, it's going to come up unfavorable for the target of the research. My standing question is what the effects are, what native species are suffering, and to what extent. If the foodweb order is being maintained with little detriment to indigenous species then the removal of bluecat and flatheads is ridiculous put against the economic value of their presence. If there's some endangered species on the verge of extinction because of them, then by all means get them out of there. I'd like to see their data.
__________________
"The solution to any problem -- work, love, money, whatever -- is to go fishing, and the worse the problem, the longer the trip should be." --John Gierach ![]() |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think there time would be much better spent figuring out how to rid the fish of worms that is widespread rather than try to fight a ghost problem. Seems like last year or year before I sent letters about relaxing restictions on blues. they are under constant attack and in the goverement these days, they lie cheat or steal to get their way.
__________________
"you cant believe everything you read on the internet" -Ben Franklin gone fishing please leave a message
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've been seeing the finger pointed at the blue catfish in the James River for a while now. It was a matter of times before something happened to curtail their explosive growth in those waters.
Everything from reductions in stripers to blue crabs has been blamed on blue catfish. I honestly have no idea what impact the blue catfish have on these species, but they are obviously getting big and they are feeding on something to do so. It will come down to who has more political power; crab fishermen or trophy catfish anglers. Hopefully some quality research can be done that will give some insight into what direction needs to be taken. |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
copy of MC2's letter to Bob Greenlee
Quote:
__________________
"Aye and lightning bolts fly from my arse" William Wallace
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Man, that is a great letter Jim!
![]() ![]() I encourage everyone to get their own letters out, to Greenlee, to VMRC, to this Bay Committee, to their legislators. I'm working on mine as well. |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
That is a great letter. I am from Ohio and fishing your tidal rivers is on my list of things to do. I was wondering if you put that letter or one like it on the opening page of this web site and have every one kick their name to it, maybe it would cary more wait. I have traved as far as santee cooper to fish for trofy cats and I am sure other fishermen have done so as well. You might want to post this story and your letter on other sites as well. KEEP UP THE FIGHT.
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just to let you know, the letters need to go to the members of GIT and cc Bob Greenlee. You can click on the list of members and get their email address from the following link: http://www.chesapeakebay.net/team_fi...menuitem=51029
Anyway, Bob requested at the meeting that letters be sent directly to GIT and to copy him so they are aware that Bob received the letter and so did every member of the committee/GIT team. I'm also sending my letter to the following additional people: VA Governor Board of Supervisors and the General Manager for Henrico and Chester Counties Some additional recommendations that I've heard people suggest is motels, bait shops, tournament groups, etc... |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
That's a good point. Greenlee is already on our side, it's the others we need to convince.
I'm sure Greentop and other bait shops would have a vested interest in keeping trophy catfishing alive as well. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| bad for economy, git, trophy blue cat |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|